‘Foucault’s Pendulum’ Tuesday, Jul 10 2007 

This engrossing novel by Italian writer, historian, and philosopher Umberto Eco has been described as the “thinking man’s ‘Da Vinci Code’ “. Having read both, I must say I have felt quite distinct feelings after reading the two novels. Whereas ‘The Da Vinci Code’ read like yet another thriller, albeit with a controversial theme, ‘Foucault’s Pendulum’ reads like a scholarly work. It is almost a reference book on Western occult and secret societies.

Although the novel has liberal doses of occult, religion (mainly Judaism and Christianity), and medieval history, the real theme is psychological. It is about how people believe outlandish conspiracy theories that, though internally consistent, may be entirely imaginary explanations of history or the real world.

Jacopo Belbo, Diotallevi, and Casaubon are three editors at Garamond Press, a small publishing firm in Milan, Italy. Casaubon, the narrator of the story, is a PhD student specializing in the history of the ever-fascinating Knights Templar. In publishing a series on occult literature, satirically named ‘Isis Unveiled’, they review dozens of occult texts written by several authors, whom they term ‘the Diabolicals’, in jest. From one such encounter with an author, they get an idea to formulate a ‘Plan’ of their own, based on all kinds of obscure occult, religious and historical texts that would give a new interpretation of the great secret of the Knights Templar and the few dozen secret societies that have been associated with the Templars over the centuries. They immerse themselves in the task wholeheartedly, initially aware of the purely fictional nature of their work. Their effort is meant to be a satire on the work of the Diabolicals. But, as they actually use all their knowledge and references to create a Plan that is remarkably consistent in all its details, they begin to suspect that it might really be the truth. Belbo and Diotallevi are particularly consumed by this thought, while Casaubon is very proud of their creation.

And then, as the summary on the back cover of the book says, ‘the Plan begins to take over’. Diotallevi dies of cancer, but attributes his death to their attempt to flout Jewish Kabbalistic norms and rewrite history. Certain people with deep occultist interests and beliefs, including some Diabolicals, get wind of the Plan, and they believe in it without question. They come to think that there is a secret which the three editors know, and which, despite their being members of obscure secret societies, they don’t. So they lure Belbo into a trap where he perhaps meets his end. The novel ends with Casaubon being anxious about his own end at the hands of the occultists, although the reader may never be completely certain that there are indeed such conspirators pursuing Casaubon.

(The plot and background of the novel can be found in some detail on this Wikipedia page.)

That is the beauty of the novel. By the end, fiction has got so mixed up with reality that one doesn’t know what to believe. That is the power of conspiracy theories with supposedly deep, earth-shaking secrets.

This is not a fast-paced thriller, and the pace quickens a bit only towards the end. Nearly two-thirds of the novel is a leisurely development of the plot, a few sub-plots, the Plan and the characters. It is full of (at times, exhaustingly full of) arcane religious rituals, secret societies, historical figures that supposedly were involved in the grand plan of the Templars. Indeed, the Plan is so carefully woven by the author that at times, it really seems true.

The book’s structure is also based on Jewish Kabbalah – divided into ten parts that are based on the ten Sefirot in the Kabbalah. In Kabbalah, a seeker gains incremental knowledge of the universe and of God by mastering each succeeding Sefirah. Similarly, with each succeeding part in the novel, the reader knows something more about what is really happening. Each chapter starts with a quote (mostly from really obscure, esoteric texts) that is appropriate to the advancement of the story in that chapter.

And finally, you wonder how one man could conceptualize a creation so complex, and yet so simple. As one of the blurbs on the book says, it is ‘endlessly diverting’. It has thrown up a huge number of leads in terms of further ‘research’ for me – occult, the fascinating world of secret societies, Western theology and history.

Ancient Athens and Modern US Thursday, Jul 5 2007 

I was reading a very brief history of the ancient Greek civilization at an excellent Website called The History Guide. While reading about the ancient Athenian city-state, I was struck by how similar it seemed to modern (post-WW II) USA. Of course, the parallels are not exact, but they are worth noting.

Two great city-states emerged in the Greek world around the 6th century BC – Athens and Sparta. Athens became a democracy (like the US, but a more direct one), while Sparta was an isolationist, militaristic city-state (like the Soviet Union). For half a century or more, each considered the other its principal rival and ’strategic threat’. There was, in effect, a Cold War between them quite similar to the modern US-USSR Cold War. The major break in this similarity came when the Athens-Sparta Cold War actually turned ‘hot’, resulting in the series of skirmishes and battles collectively called the Peloponnesian Wars. One of the major reasons the modern Cold War never turned ‘hot’ may be because of the mutual deterrent nuclear weapons that each side possessed.

After Persia attacked Athens at Marathon and then at Thermopylae with relatively small forces (a weak parallel to the 9/11 attacks on the US), Athens and its allies defeated them and drove them back to their homeland. But, many Athenians were not satisfied with this victory and wanted to march into Persian territory and defeat the ‘barbarians’ in their own land. In order to do this, it gathered together a group of smaller city-states and formed an alliance called the Delian League, of which it assumed leadership. Much like the US, which launched the ‘global war on terrorism’, drafting allies by coaxing, nudging or coercing them.

Athens, like the US, was a democracy at home, and wished to ‘promote democracy abroad’. By driving the Persians back, it claimed to ‘liberate’ a lot of small city-states. Persia was a convenient rival around which to gang up with those city-states. The US chose to do the same by attacking Afghanistan and Iraq, and deliberately upping the ante against Iran and North Korea.

The Peloponnesian wars changed everything, though, and the parallels drawn here, end. It was the democratic Athens which suffered the most and was devastated by these wars, while the militaristic Sparta emerged victorious, imposing a non-democratic government on Athens. The modern Cold War, on the other hand, ended with the Communist USSR disintegrating and the US emerging as a sole superpower.

Patterns do repeat in history, and people do forget historic lessons…